Archive for the ‘Keywords’ Category

Keywords Part 18: Directory Names

Monday, November 17th, 2008

This tip seems pretty obvious…If you have to create a new directory, why not use one of your keywords in the name of the folder?  It’s a great place to add another keyword, but beware, there are pitfalls.

If you place your web pages into directories just to add another keyword, you may be hurting your Google ranking more than you’re helping it.  But wait, didn’t I just tell you that it was a good place to hide your keywords?  Notice, I actually said that “if you have to create a new directory…”  I didn’t say that you should make new directories.  You see, if you have files that are saved within folders that are buried within other folders, then search engines may actually ignore your pages.  Many search engines are lazy.  They don’t want to dig for your content.  Even if you feel like your pages are more neatly organized, you’re probably harming yourself by using too many directories.  The IBCC recommends that you never bury a file within more than one directory.  Preferably, your files should be saved at the root level to increase the odds of your pages being spidered.

To keep your site files organized, you can still use the same naming conventions you’d use with a folder, but just add the folder name to the beginning of the HTML file name.  For instance, name your file articles_keywords_part_18.html.  That way all of your files are still grouped alphabetically, yet they are not accidentally missed by the search engines.

Hope that helps.

Chadd Bryant

SEO: Keywords Part 17 – Anchor Text

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

Yesterday we talked about anchor text and how Google began using links as the primary means for ranking sites about 5 years ago.

Today, we’re going to pick up there and talk about good anchor text vs. bad anchor text.  I had one of those moments a couple years ago where a little light bulb came on.  For years so-called “SEO Gurus’ had been saying that you had to get links from sites that were closely related to your topic if you wanted your site to rank well.  In fact, if sites that were not closely related to your site, linked to yours, it would count for little or even potentially harm your ranking on Google.  This rhetoric was great for scaring people.  Then one day, I decided to search Google for the phrase “click here.”  Try it yourself.

The results are the same today as they were years ago.  Adobe’s website comes up ranked at the top.  Specifically, their page where you can download the Adobe Acrobat Reader.  But here’s the funny thing.  That page doesn’t mention the word “click” or “click here.”  The page doesn’t even mention the phase so how on earth could they come up ranked number one for that phrase?

Because millions of sites link to them with the phrase “click here.”  Practically every site that offers some sort of PDF download, also says that if you need the Acrobat Reader, you can click here to download it for free.  Bam the light went on. It wasn’t about the sites that linked to them.  It wasn’t about the content on the Adobe page.  It was only about the anchor text on millions of other sites and what it said.  The sites that linked to Adobe could have been everything from auto dealers to doctors’ offices.  It didn’t matter whether or not they were closely related to the same topic as the Adobe site.

So that raised the question, how many people had wasted time getting other sites that were closely related to them, to link to them but neglected to use good anchor text.  You see, if you get a hundred sites to link to your site and all of them use “click here” as the anchor text, your site will only rank better for that silly phrase.  On the other hand, if you own a real estate brokerage firm in Miami, and you get a bunch of sites to link to your site with the phrase “Miami Realtors” you’ll likely rank better for a phrase that would benefit your business.  Are you starting to see the difference between good and bad anchor text?

Here’s one of the big mistake web designers make.  They have a link on someone’s site that looks like this:

Miami Real Estate
http://www.miamirealestate.com

That sort of link just increases your site’s visibility when someone is searching for http://www.miamirealestate.com.  Think about how stupid that is.  If they know the domain name, they don’t need to search for it.  You want to be found when someone searches for Miami Real Estate so use that as the link itself.  This is much better:

Miami Real Estate
http://www.miamirealestate.com

Now do you see the difference?   I hope that helps.  Just remember to use good anchor text and more importantly, when you trade links with another site, get them to use good anchor text to link to your site.  If they don’t know what you’re talking about, refer them to this posting.  Otherwise you’re just wasting your time building links to your site with a link that is worthless in terms of your Google ranking.

Chadd Bryant
Founder, IBCC

SEO: Keywords Part 16 – Anchor Text

Friday, November 14th, 2008

While each day I think that the topic is pretty simple, this one is sometimes tough to convey.  Anchor text.  You know, it’s the blue, underlined hypertext link.  The words used in the link are considered your anchor text.  After years of Google being jacked around by underhanded webmasters who were aggressively cheating their way into the rankings, Google decided to clamp down and take the majority of the power away from the webmaster and give that power to the voting public.  Now, unscrupulous web designers can’t cheat their way to the top of the listings as they once could.  As you may recall, when Google first started, you’d be searching for something innocent like restaurants and you’d be confronted with illicit images that were quite objectionable.  How did those companies get their objectionable sites to come up when you were searching for restaurants?  Easy.  They’d fill their site with words that were unrelated to their content, just to get you to their site.  They’d hide the word “restaurants” in their code and Google would naturally think that their page was about restaurants rather than something much more lude.

Google saw the same results and eventually they changed things.  I think it was about November of 2003 when they had their biggest dynamic shift.  They changed the way they ranked sites and overnight, sites that were at the top, fell to the bottom of the results.  Unfortunately, some legitimate businesses went from success to failure overnight.  Their entire source of business dried up and no one visited their sites any more.  That was the cost we had to pay for more relevant results.

So how did they begin ranking sites?  They started using the number of links leading to a site as the main indicator that a site was really about something like “restaurants.”  If Google saw that your site had 100 other sites like linked to it with the phrase “restaurants” they figured that your site must really be about restaurants.  After all, if you ran an objectionable site, you’d have a hard time getting 100 other sites that would link to your filthy site, especially with a link that says “restaurants.”

You see, it’s generally assumed that the text in a hyperlink describes the page that it leads to.  For instance, if a page says, “click to check out our list of great restaurants,” you’d assume that if you click on the link, it would take you to a list of great restaurants.

So Google began looking at the anchor text as a way to rank sites.  Links became the primary means for ranking because the results could be more reliable since the voting public essentially controlled a large part of the equation.

If you could get 100 sites to link to your restaurant with a link that said “great restaurants in Denver” then your site would likely be found toward the top of the search results when someone searched Google for that phrase.  Sure, your site still needed to be about restaurants in Denver, but the majority of the weight when ranking your site came from the other sites that linked to your site.

Since 2003, the ranking algorithm has become even more sophisticated and today, Google incorporates more than 100 different factors into their calculations when deciding where your site will come up in their search results.

Tomorrow, we’ll pick up here and talk more about anchor text to help you avoid making some of the more common mistakes.

Chadd Bryant

SEO – Keywords Part 15

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

I seem to think everyday, “This tip is pretty straight forward.”  When it comes to SEO, none of the techniques are rocket science.  The hard part is just making sure that you get all of the little details put together.  It’s like a puzzle.  Look at two puzzle pieces that fit together.   Taken by themselves, they’re relatively simple.  Just a couple pieces of cardboard with notches cut in them.  But toss them in the box, shake it up and the problem becomes a little more complex.  SEO is very much the same.  Each of the little pieces, by themselves, are relatively simple.  Really, how hard is it to put your keywords in your headline?  Or how about remembering to make them bold in your page?  Not too hard either.  But when you get a list of hundreds of things like that, SEO becomes as complex and time-consuming as a 1000 piece puzzle.

So for today’s topic, let’s talk about phrase order.  It’s pretty straight forward.  :-)

It’s important to make sure that you try as much as possible to make your keyword phrases on your page, match the order of the words in the search query.  But how will you know what people are searching for?  We’ll get into that more in the next few weeks, but for now, let’s just say that you have to do your homework and do the research to discover first what people are searching for.  It does you no good to build a site that’s optimized for a phrase that no one is looking for.  You have to be sure that people are looking for the phrase first.

Or, you may find out with some research that twice as many people are looking for one phrase than another closely-related phrase.  I see it all the time.  Let’s say you’re going to make a site about cats.  But after doing a little research you may find that twice as many people are looking for kittens as cats.  Or maybe 4 times as many people are looking for “dogs.”  If that’s the case, you may change the direction of the site.  There are a lot more considerations to take into account when doing keyword research but we’ll talk more about that later.

To begin your research, just check out Google’s page where they tell you how many people are searching for each phrase last month.

https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal

So now that you’ve looked into the most popular phrases, let’s get back to keyword order.  If you see that 120 people a day are looking for “food for cats” and 276 are looking for “cat food” it only seems logical that you’d want to optimize the page for “cat food.”  Mentioning the alternative phrase helps a little because the same words are still used in the phrase “food for cats” but it’s not as relevant as a direct match for “cat food.”  Therefore sites that mention “cat food” more will be seen as a better match for the search query and will likely come up higher in the search results pages.

Chadd Bryant

SEO – Keywords Part 14

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

After a little break yesterday, let’s get right back into it.   Keyword proximity.  This one’s really straight forward.  Keep your keywords close to each other if they are related in the same phrase.  Let’s say you’re looking to optimize your page for the phrase “keyword proximity.”  It seems obvious that if your words are not close enough to each other, Google won’t see them in relation to each other and will not rank the page well for that phrase.

Here’s an example.  You write a paragraph about keyword proximity but you don’t want to sound too repetitive so you try and mix it up a little bit.  Great.  However, if you talk a lot about the “proximity of keywords” that’s great because “keyword proximity” and “the proximity of keywords” are relatively close to each other.  Google sees that and can put 2 and 2 together.

On the other hand, if you just mention the word “proximity” a few times and then later in the document talk about “keywords”, they’re not close enough to each other to cue Google into seeing the correlation, missing the theme of the page.

Even worse, if you change things up too much and only mention “keyword proximity” once and then use the phrase “keyword location” the next time and then say that “you need to make sure that your keywords are close to each other” the last time, only a human is smart enough to see the common theme.  Google’s computers won’t catch your drift and they’ll just see a page that mentions each of those phrases once, not really placing emphasis on any one of them.  Repeat the phrase several times, place importance on the same phrase by putting it in your headline and title and Google starts to think, “Now this page is about keyword proximity.”

Chadd Bryant

SEO: Keywords Part 13

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

Some people are superstitious and would skip over Part 13.  I’m not.  I do however, enjoy watching “The Office” on NBC.   Michael Scott when asked if he was superstitious, replied “…no, I don’t consider myself superstitious… just a little stitious, maybe…”

So for those of you who are even a little stitious, we’ll just leave Part 13 at that so your not always afraid of “keyword proximity.”  We’ll cover that one tomorrow.

My apologies to those of you who would have been unaffected by the number 13.

Chadd Bryant

SEO: Keywords Part 12

Monday, November 10th, 2008

Today’s post is pretty straight forward.  Bigger words carry more weight.  If you place your keyword phrase in your headline in a 20-point font, that obviously tells Google that your page is really about that topic.  Same thing goes for bolded words.  Even italicizing words can help.  Don’t just go and make your whole page in 20-point Helvetica.  It’s about contrast.  If you choose to put 100 words in a 10-point font and just three words are bolded in 20 point, then you’re intentionally drawing attention to those words.  Google sees that and gives those words more weight in their ranking algorithm.

Chadd Bryant

SEO: Keywords Part 11

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

If you’ve been working in the SEO world for very long, by now you know that Headlines are one of the first places that keywords should be used.  However, I still see a lot of webmaster who overlook the H1 and H2 tags.  These tags are attached to your headlines and subheads to draw attention to them from the search engines.  As you may recall, if you’ve been following my blog for any amount of time, I keep mentioning that Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it accessible for everyone.  Basically they prefer information that’s organized like a doctoral thesis with a clearly identified table of contents and each chapter backs up the previous one.  Furthermore, Google likes to see individual pages that help them to quickly identify what the point of the content is.  If you have headlines and subheads that tell what the page is about, and then tell what the subsections are about, you’re helping Google to do their job.  But just adding a headline and subhead doesn’t do a lot of good, if Google doesn’t know that that’s your headline.  That’s why H1 and H2 tags are so important.  By using them, you’re essentially telling Google, when their spiders arrive at your site, that this is your headline.

One common mistake that I see all the time, is that people want to have graphic headlines, so they use an image instead of actual text.  Obviously, Google can’t read your images so they don’t even know what the page is about.  Up until recently, the same was true for Flash sites.

Until tomorrow,

Chadd Bryant

SEO: Keywords Part 10

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Another way to increase your keyword density without making your pages sound like they are jammed with the same keyword over and over is to utilize keyword stemming.  It’s pretty simple.  If you’re trying to optimize a page for a particular phrase, think about other words that contain that same word.  Use singular, plural, past forms, present forms etc.  Take the word “stem” for instance.  Could you use stemming, stems, stemmed, stemmification?  Well, maybe that one’s a little out there.  The point is that you have the flexibility to improve the variation in your content by using keyword stems.  Be creative and think about other ways to say things.

Getting to the stem of the problems…

Chadd Bryant

Keywords – Part 9

Friday, November 7th, 2008

The term “keyword density” is pretty controversial.  Some web development companies believe that website pages should be written naturally and search engines will eventually find the site.  Others believe that pages should be written with calculated precision, choosing just the right number of words to include and repeating them just the right amount of times.  After considerable research, the IBCC has concluded that the later method is more effective when trying to achieve top positions on the major search engines.  In fact, keyword densities in the range of 2.5% to 5% have been consistently shown to achieve the highest rankings.

A keyword density of 5% means that for every 100 words, the same keyword phrase is repeated 5 times.  While that may seem like a lot of repeated words, you don’t have to repeat the words in the visible text that people are reading.  If you’ve been following for the past few weeks, you know by now that the keywords can be used in the title, comments, ALT tags and other places where the reader will likely never see the words, but the search engines will see them.

When developing your content, it’s a good idea to create a template that shows the title, meta keywords, description, ALT tags, headline that will use the H1 tags and the visible text.   This way, you’ll focus on the right keywords through out the page.  And you can easily count the number of times that each phrase is repeated, compared to the total number of words used.

Hope that helps.

Chadd Bryant